My Favourites
Remove All Filters
Filtered by Argument
Remove Filter
Filter by Date Last DayLast WeekLast MonthLast 3 MonthsLast 6 MonthsLast Year
(YYYY-MM-DD)
(YYYY-MM-DD)
Filter by Commodity ElectricityGasOilOther
 Filtered by: Argument
This will only search for documents within selected categories.

Matching Items

Item(s) - 1 to 20 out of about 740
A81736-1 Sierra Club Comment on ruling 1.2 - A5I8C3   Date: 2017-02-15
Submitter:
Sierra Club Canada Foundation

Good Morning, In the Panel's Ruling No. 1.2 comment is requested on whether to hear the Energy East and Eastern Mainline applications together or separately. Second, the proposed location of the join...
A81736-2 NEB response to ruling 1.2 - A5I8C4 (Paper Only)   Date: 2017-02-15
Submitter:
Sierra Club Canada Foundation
A81729-2 Reply Argument of U.S. Oil - Refining Co. - A5I7Z3   Date: 2017-02-14
Submitter:
U.S. Oil - Refining Co.

In accordance with the process established by the National Energy Board (“Board” or “NEB”) in its letter dated December 16, 2016, following is the reply of U.S. Oil & Refining Co. (“U.S. Oil”) to the ...
A81669-1 Shell Trading Canada Written Argument Response to U.S. Oil Complaint A81570 - A5I7A4   Date: 2017-02-07
Submitter:
Shell Trading Canada

U.S. Oil & Refining Co. (“U.S. Oil”) has filed a complaint to the National Energy Board (the “Board”) against Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC (“Trans Mountain”) respecting the allocation of capacity among...
A81667-2 Trans Mountain - Written Argument - A5I7A0   Date: 2017-02-07
Submitter:
Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC

On October 11, 2016, U.S. Oil & Refining Co. ("U.S. Oil") filed a complaint 1 ("Complaint") with the National Energy Board ("Board") "respecting the procedure being used by Trans Mountain to allocate ...
A81570-2 Argument of U.S. Oil - A5I5K6   Date: 2017-01-31
Submitter:
U.S. Oil and Refining Co.

The procedure now being used by Trans Mountain to allocate the ~160,000 bbls of capacity in the barge subcategory does not afford U.S. Oil a fair opportunity to acquire the capacity. The procedure re...
A79683-2 Application for Approval of T-South Winter Firm Service - Reply Argument - A5F4R7   Date: 2016-09-30
Submitter:
Westcoast Energy Inc., doing business as Spectra Energy Transmission (Westcoast)

Westcoast will respond to certain submissions made in the Final Arguments of FortisBC Energy Inc. (Fortis), BP Canada Energy Group ULC (BP Canada), Powerex Corp. (Powerex), Pacific Northern Gas Ltd. (...
A79683-1 Application for Approval of T-South Winter Firm Service - Reply Argument Cover Letter - A5F4R6   Date: 2016-09-30
Submitter:
Westcoast Energy Inc., doing business as Spectra Energy Transmission (Westcoast)

Darren Christie Director, Regulatory Affairs 403-699-1751 Direct 403-699-1585 Fax DAChristie@spectraenergy.com. Any questions with respect to this filing should be directed to the undersigned. Yours...
A79571-2 Powerex Corp. Written Argument - A5F3A9   Date: 2016-09-23
Submitter:
Powerex Corp.

Westcoast currently has 1,450 MMcf/d of annual firm contracted capacity on the System to the HDA and is applying for an additional 160 MMcf/d of WFS, for a total 1,610 MMcf/d of firm service during th...
A79572-2 BP Canada Argument - A5F3C2   Date: 2016-09-23
Submitter:
BP Canada Energy Group ULC

Westcoast is vague as to whether its assertion that tolls would be considerably more expensive in the event of an expansion is relative to future FT-S tolls or its proposed WF Service tolls. Current ...
A79573-1 160923_Westcoast Approval of T-South Winter Firm Service_FEI Final Argument_FF - A5F3C4   Date: 2016-09-23
Submitter:
FortisBC Energy Inc.

Transmission (“Westcoast”), seeks the National Energy Board’s (the “Board”) approval of amendments to its current tariff that would introduce a new transportation service on Westcoast’s T-South system...
A79574-1 EUG Final Argument - Westcoast T-South Winter Firm Service Sep23-16 - A5F3C6   Date: 2016-09-23
Submitter:
Export Users Group

Westcoast’s evidence establishes that 160 MMcf/d of firm winter capacity is available for contracting as WF Service.1 The key issue in this proceeding is what is the best means to offer that capacity ...
A79581-1 Westcoast T-South Winter Firm Service - Tenaska Agument - September 23, 2016 - A5F3F6   Date: 2016-09-23
Submitter:
Tenaska Marketing Canada, a division of TMV Corp.

Westcoast Energy Inc., carrying on business as Spectra Energy Transmission (Westcoast) Application for Approval of T-South Winter Firm Service Argument of Tenaska Marketing Canada, a Division of TMV C...
A79585-2 PNG Argument on Westcoast T-South WFS App - A5F3G7   Date: 2016-09-23
Submitter:
Pacific Northern Gas Ltd

PNG and PNG(NE) obtain almost all of their gas supply through interconnections with the. capacity is symptomatic of the loss of efficient allocation of T-South capacity that would occur with the intr...
A79561-2 GazMétro_Argumentation_écrite_22septembre2016 - A5F2Y4   Date: 2016-09-22
Submitter:
Société en commandite Gaz Métro

TransCanada propose que ces amendements entrent en vigueur le 1er avril 20174; L’INTÉRÊT DE GAZ MÉTRO À titre d’utilité publique, Société en commandite Gaz Métro (ci-après « Gaz Métro ») est la princi...
A79434-2 Aplication for Approval of T-South Winter Firm Service - Westcoast Written Argument - A5F1I8   Date: 2016-09-16
Submitter:
Westcoast Energy Inc., doing business as Spectra Energy Transmission

Following is the Final Argument of Westcoast regarding its May 11, 2016 Application pursuant to Part IV of the National Energy Board Act for approval to implement Winter Firm Service (WF Service) in Z...
A79434-1 Aplication for Approval of T-South Winter Firm Service - Westcoast Written Argument - Cover Letter - A5F1I7   Date: 2016-09-16
Submitter:
Westcoast Energy Inc., doing business as Spectra Energy Transmission

Darren Christie Director, Regulatory Affairs 403-699-1751 Direct 403-699-1585 Fax DAChristie@spectraenergy.com. Any questions with respect to this filing should be directed to the undersigned. Yours...
A79048-1 Lake Erie Connector IESO Comments on Possible Conditions - A5E6G0   Date: 2016-08-19
Submitter:
IESO

The Ontario Market Rules place sufficient requirements and conditions on market participants to allow the IESO to effectively perform this function, and therefore part (a) of this condition is not nee...
A78958-2 16-08-12 ITC Lake Erie LLC - Final Argument and Comments on Proposed Possible Conditions for Comment - A5E4V4   Date: 2016-08-12
Submitter:
ITC Lake Erie Connector LLC

ITC Lake Erie Connector LLC (ITC) is proposing to build, own and operate a 1000 MW high voltage direct current international power line (the Lake Erie Connector or Project) that will connect Canada (H...
A78875-1 Podium Energy Corporation - Appeal Motion - Energy East   Date: 2016-08-09
Submitter:
Podium Energy Corporation

The Request: Podium would like to file a formal motion to appeal the NEB Board's decision to exclude Podium Energy Corp as an intervenor for the 2016 Panel Hearing Sessions taking place (specifically ...
Some of the material on this site originates with organizations not subject to the Official Languages Act and is available in the language in which it was written.
Certains des textes sur ce site proviennent d'organismes qui ne sont pas assujettis à la Loi sur les langues officielles et ils sont disponibles dans la langue d'origine.